Skip to content

Only start an attempt if not finished. Send message to worker if pending executing #2377

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 11, 2025

Conversation

matt-aitken
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Aug 8, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 9664de1

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 8, 2025

Walkthrough

The PR tightens run lifecycle status checks. In runAttemptSystem.ts, startRunAttempt now prevents starting attempts when the latest snapshot executionStatus is finished or pending-finished by using isFinishedOrPendingFinished. cancelRun now treats runs with executionStatus executing or pending-executing (via isPendingExecuting) as eligible to transition to PENDING_CANCEL and notify the worker. In execution.ts, when a snapshot executionStatus is FINISHED the shutdown reason passed is changed to "already-finished" instead of "re-queued". No public/exported signatures changed.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch start-attempt-final-check

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/runAttemptSystem.ts (2)

353-355: Block starting attempts when snapshot is finished or cancelling — good; refine error details

The broadened guard prevents attempts when the latest snapshot is FINISHED or PENDING_CANCEL, which matches the intent. Nit: the error reads like only “finished,” and 409 (Conflict) better reflects state conflicts than 400.

Apply this diff to improve clarity:

-          if (isFinishedOrPendingFinished(latestSnapshot.executionStatus)) {
-            throw new ServiceValidationError("Task run is already finished", 400);
-          }
+          if (isFinishedOrPendingFinished(latestSnapshot.executionStatus)) {
+            throw new ServiceValidationError("Task run is finished or cancelling", 409);
+          }

1329-1332: Notify worker when run is pending executing — matches intent; optional helper for readability

Including PENDING_EXECUTING in the “notify worker and set PENDING_CANCEL” path is correct and aligns with the PR goal. As a minor readability tweak, consider extracting a small helper (e.g., isExecutingOrPendingExecuting) to centralize this combined check.

If desirable, add to statuses.ts:

  • export function isExecutingOrPendingExecuting(status): boolean { return isExecuting(status) || isPendingExecuting(status); }

Then replace the condition here accordingly.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a968c23 and ef9ee5a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/runAttemptSystem.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.{ts,tsx}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

**/*.{ts,tsx}: Always prefer using isomorphic code like fetch, ReadableStream, etc. instead of Node.js specific code
For TypeScript, we usually use types over interfaces
Avoid enums
No default exports, use function declarations

Files:

  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/runAttemptSystem.ts
🧠 Learnings (8)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: matt-aitken
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#2264
File: apps/webapp/app/services/runsRepository.server.ts:172-174
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T18:06:04.133Z
Learning: In apps/webapp/app/services/runsRepository.server.ts, the in-memory status filtering after fetching runs from Prisma is intentionally used as a workaround for ClickHouse data delays. This approach is acceptable because the result set is limited to a maximum of 100 runs due to pagination, making the performance impact negligible.
Learnt from: CR
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#0
File: .cursor/rules/webapp.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T17:49:47.180Z
Learning: Do not use or add new code to the legacy run engine; focus on using and migrating to Run Engine 2.0 in `internal/run-engine`.
📚 Learning: 2024-10-18T15:41:52.352Z
Learnt from: nicktrn
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#1418
File: packages/core/src/v3/errors.ts:364-371
Timestamp: 2024-10-18T15:41:52.352Z
Learning: In `packages/core/src/v3/errors.ts`, within the `taskRunErrorEnhancer` function, `error.message` is always defined, so it's safe to directly call `error.message.includes("SIGTERM")` without additional checks.

Applied to files:

  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/runAttemptSystem.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-07-18T17:49:47.180Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#0
File: .cursor/rules/webapp.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T17:49:47.180Z
Learning: Do not use or add new code to the legacy run engine; focus on using and migrating to Run Engine 2.0 in `internal/run-engine`.

Applied to files:

  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/runAttemptSystem.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-07-12T18:06:04.133Z
Learnt from: matt-aitken
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#2264
File: apps/webapp/app/services/runsRepository.server.ts:172-174
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T18:06:04.133Z
Learning: In apps/webapp/app/services/runsRepository.server.ts, the in-memory status filtering after fetching runs from Prisma is intentionally used as a workaround for ClickHouse data delays. This approach is acceptable because the result set is limited to a maximum of 100 runs due to pagination, making the performance impact negligible.

Applied to files:

  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/runAttemptSystem.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-07-18T17:50:25.014Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#0
File: .cursor/rules/writing-tasks.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T17:50:25.014Z
Learning: Applies to **/trigger/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : When triggering a task from inside another task, use `yourTask.trigger`, `yourTask.batchTrigger`, `yourTask.triggerAndWait`, `yourTask.batchTriggerAndWait`, `batch.triggerAndWait`, `batch.triggerByTask`, or `batch.triggerByTaskAndWait` as shown.

Applied to files:

  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/runAttemptSystem.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-07-18T17:50:25.014Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#0
File: .cursor/rules/writing-tasks.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T17:50:25.014Z
Learning: Applies to **/trigger/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : When triggering a task from backend code, use `tasks.trigger`, `tasks.batchTrigger`, or `tasks.triggerAndPoll` as shown in the examples.

Applied to files:

  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/runAttemptSystem.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-07-18T17:50:25.014Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#0
File: .cursor/rules/writing-tasks.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T17:50:25.014Z
Learning: Applies to **/trigger/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : When using retry, queue, machine, or maxDuration options, configure them as shown in the examples for Trigger.dev tasks.

Applied to files:

  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/runAttemptSystem.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-07-18T17:50:25.014Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#0
File: .cursor/rules/writing-tasks.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T17:50:25.014Z
Learning: Applies to **/trigger/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : When using Realtime features, use the `runs.subscribeToRun`, `runs.subscribeToRunsWithTag`, and `runs.subscribeToBatch` APIs as shown.

Applied to files:

  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/runAttemptSystem.ts
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/runAttemptSystem.ts (2)
internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/statuses.ts (3)
  • isFinishedOrPendingFinished (34-37)
  • isExecuting (8-14)
  • isPendingExecuting (16-19)
internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/errors.ts (1)
  • ServiceValidationError (59-67)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (23)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (2, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (6, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (1, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (5, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (8, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (7, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (4, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (7, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (3, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (8, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (6, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (2, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (4, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (3, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (5, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (1, 8)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: units / packages / 🧪 Unit Tests: Packages (1, 1)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/runAttemptSystem.ts (1)

44-49: Importing status helpers is correct and consistent

All imported helpers are used below (no unused imports) and align with Run Engine 2.0 usage.

@matt-aitken matt-aitken force-pushed the start-attempt-final-check branch from ef9ee5a to 86ba734 Compare August 11, 2025 10:26
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/cli-v3/src/entryPoints/managed/execution.ts (1)

1045-1063: Consider standardizing shutdown reason tokens (optional)

Reason strings are a mix of spaced and kebab-case values. Normalizing (e.g., kebab-case) and/or using a typed string union/constant map can prevent typos and make log querying simpler. Non-blocking.

Example (local to this module):

const ShutdownReasons = {
  Kill: "kill",
  Shutdown: "shutdown",
  Abort: "abortExecution",
  AlreadyFinished: "already-finished",
  ReQueued: "re-queued",
  Suspended: "suspended",
  Deprecated: "deprecated-execution",
} as const;
type ShutdownReason = typeof ShutdownReasons[keyof typeof ShutdownReasons];

// usage:
// this.shutdownExecution(ShutdownReasons.AlreadyFinished)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef9ee5a and 86ba734.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/runAttemptSystem.ts (3 hunks)
  • packages/cli-v3/src/entryPoints/managed/execution.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/runAttemptSystem.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.{ts,tsx}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

**/*.{ts,tsx}: Always prefer using isomorphic code like fetch, ReadableStream, etc. instead of Node.js specific code
For TypeScript, we usually use types over interfaces
Avoid enums
No default exports, use function declarations

Files:

  • packages/cli-v3/src/entryPoints/managed/execution.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (23)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (7, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (8, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (3, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (4, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (5, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (6, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (8, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (6, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (1, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (2, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (4, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (7, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (5, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (3, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (1, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (2, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / packages / 🧪 Unit Tests: Packages (1, 1)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/cli-v3/src/entryPoints/managed/execution.ts (1)

303-305: Accurate shutdown reason for FINISHED — LGTM

Switching the FINISHED path to use reason "already-finished" is correct and improves log clarity without changing behavior.

The old behaviour was wrong for pending executing in the test
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/tests/cancelling.test.ts (6)

153-153: Fix comment to reference the correct API name.

Use the actual method name to avoid confusion.

-        // call completeAttempt manually (this will happen from the worker)
+        // call completeRunAttempt manually (this will happen from the worker)

77-83: Reduce flakiness: avoid fixed sleeps before dequeues; poll until items are available.

Using a fixed 500ms delay can be racy under load. Poll for availability instead of sleeping once.

-        //dequeue the run
-        await setTimeout(500);
-        const dequeued = await engine.dequeueFromWorkerQueue({
-          consumerId: "test_12345",
-          workerQueue: "main",
-        });
+        //dequeue the run
+        const dequeued = await waitForDequeue(engine, "main", "test_12345");

...

-        //dequeue the child run
-        await setTimeout(500);
-        const dequeuedChild = await engine.dequeueFromWorkerQueue({
-          consumerId: "test_12345",
-          workerQueue: "main",
-        });
+        //dequeue the child run
+        const dequeuedChild = await waitForDequeue(engine, "main", "test_12345");

Add this helper near the top of the file (outside the test cases):

async function waitForDequeue(
  engine: RunEngine,
  workerQueue: string,
  consumerId: string,
  timeoutMs = 5000,
  intervalMs = 50
) {
  const start = Date.now();
  while (Date.now() - start < timeoutMs) {
    const items = await engine.dequeueFromWorkerQueue({ consumerId, workerQueue });
    if (items.length > 0) return items;
    await setTimeout(intervalMs);
  }
  throw new Error(`Timed out waiting to dequeue from ${workerQueue}`);
}

Also applies to: 114-120


178-184: Reduce flakiness: poll for the second worker notification instead of a fixed 200ms sleep.

Polling avoids timing issues and makes the test more robust.

-        //cancelling children is async, so we need to wait a brief moment
-        await setTimeout(200);
-
-        //check a worker notification was sent for the running parent
-        expect(workerNotifications).toHaveLength(2);
-        expect(workerNotifications[1].run.id).toBe(childRun.id);
+        // wait until the child cancellation notification arrives
+        await waitFor(async () => workerNotifications.length >= 2);
+        expect(workerNotifications[1].run.id).toBe(childRun.id);

Add this tiny helper near the top (or reuse an existing one if you have it):

async function waitFor(predicate: () => boolean | Promise<boolean>, timeoutMs = 5000, intervalMs = 50) {
  const start = Date.now();
  while (Date.now() - start < timeoutMs) {
    if (await predicate()) return;
    await setTimeout(intervalMs);
  }
  throw new Error("Timed out waiting for condition");
}

122-126: Remove unused variable or assert its state.

childAttempt is never read. Either drop the binding or assert its expected state.

Option A (remove binding):

-        const childAttempt = await engine.startRunAttempt({
+        await engine.startRunAttempt({
           runId: childRun.id,
           snapshotId: dequeuedChild[0].snapshot.id,
         });

Option B (assert it executed):

         const childAttempt = await engine.startRunAttempt({
           runId: childRun.id,
           snapshotId: dequeuedChild[0].snapshot.id,
         });
+        expect(childAttempt.snapshot.executionStatus).toBe("EXECUTING");

154-166: Either use completeResult or avoid assigning it.

Currently completeResult is never read. Prefer asserting the immediate outcome to strengthen the test.

         const completeResult = await engine.completeRunAttempt({
           runId: parentRun.id,
           snapshotId: executionData!.snapshot.id,
           completion: {
             ok: false,
             id: executionData!.run.id,
             error: {
               type: "INTERNAL_ERROR" as const,
               code: "TASK_RUN_CANCELLED" as const,
             },
           },
         });
+        expect(completeResult.snapshot.executionStatus).toBe("FINISHED");

292-303: Assert negative case: no worker notification for non-executing run.

This PR ensures we notify workers for executing or pending-executing runs. For a run that hasn't started executing, assert that no notification is sent.

Add a listener before cancellation:

     let cancelledEventData: EventBusEventArgs<"runCancelled">[0][] = [];
     engine.eventBus.on("runCancelled", (result) => {
       cancelledEventData.push(result);
     });
+
+    const workerNotifications: EventBusEventArgs<"workerNotification">[0][] = [];
+    engine.eventBus.on("workerNotification", (evt) => {
+      workerNotifications.push(evt);
+    });

     //cancel the parent run
     const result = await engine.cancelRun({
       runId: parentRun.id,
       completedAt: new Date(),
       reason: "Cancelled by the user",
     });
     expect(result.snapshot.executionStatus).toBe("FINISHED");
+    expect(workerNotifications).toHaveLength(0);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 86ba734 and 9664de1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/tests/cancelling.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
**/*.{ts,tsx}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

**/*.{ts,tsx}: Always prefer using isomorphic code like fetch, ReadableStream, etc. instead of Node.js specific code
For TypeScript, we usually use types over interfaces
Avoid enums
No default exports, use function declarations

Files:

  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/tests/cancelling.test.ts
**/*.test.{ts,tsx}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

Our tests are all vitest

Files:

  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/tests/cancelling.test.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (23)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (8, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (4, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (7, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (2, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (1, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (3, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (6, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (5, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (8, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (7, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (6, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (5, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (4, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (2, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (1, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (3, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / packages / 🧪 Unit Tests: Packages (1, 1)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)

@matt-aitken matt-aitken merged commit ae19d0f into main Aug 11, 2025
31 checks passed
@matt-aitken matt-aitken deleted the start-attempt-final-check branch August 11, 2025 10:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants